data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd5d/ffd5d4bff09c76d32286628bb33a1a9b80d154f3" alt=""
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
A Spectacular Copy of Cowell's Interpreter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd5d/ffd5d4bff09c76d32286628bb33a1a9b80d154f3" alt=""
This copy of The Interpreter joins several other editions already in our collection, including the first edition. Published in 1607, the first edition ignited a scandal and was banned by King James in 1610. Very briefly, Cowell got into trouble for several of his definitions, especially "King," "Parliament," "Prerogative," and "Subsidy." Cowell seemed to favor an absolute monarch who was above the common law. This infuriated Chief Justice Edward Coke and Parliament. Though he secretly agreed with Cowell's definitions, James tried to placate Coke and Parliament by suppressing the book. Though banned for a time, not all copies of the first edition were destroyed, and The Interpreter went on to be published in ten editions during the 17th and 18th centuries.
For much more on the controversy surrounding The Interpreter, see Frederick Hicks, Men and Books Famous in the Law (1921).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment